Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] x86/kasan: support KASAN_VMALLOC
From: Daniel Axtens <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-30 14:21:21
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Andrey Ryabinin [off-list ref] writes:
On 10/30/19 4:50 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:quoted
Andrey Ryabinin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 10/29/19 7:20 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:quoted
In the case where KASAN directly allocates memory to back vmalloc space, don't map the early shadow page over it. We prepopulate pgds/p4ds for the range that would otherwise be empty. This is required to get it synced to hardware on boot, allowing the lower levels of the page tables to be filled dynamically. Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <redacted> ---quoted
+static void __init kasan_shallow_populate_pgds(void *start, void *end) +{ + unsigned long addr, next; + pgd_t *pgd; + void *p; + int nid = early_pfn_to_nid((unsigned long)start);This doesn't make sense. start is not even a pfn. With linear mapping we try to identify nid to have the shadow on the same node as memory. But in this case we don't have memory or the corresponding shadow (yet), we only install pgd/p4d. I guess we could just use NUMA_NO_NODE.Ah wow, that's quite the clanger on my part. There are a couple of other invocations of early_pfn_to_nid in that file that use an address directly, but at least they reference actual memory. I'll send a separate patch to fix those up.I see only one incorrect, in kasan_init(): early_pfn_to_nid(__pa(_stext)) It should be wrapped with PFN_DOWN(). Other usages in map_range() seems to be correct, range->start,end is pfns.
Oh, right, I didn't realise map_range was already using pfns.
quoted
quoted
The rest looks ok, so with that fixed: Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <redacted>Thanks heaps! I've fixed up the nit you identifed in the first patch, and I agree that the last patch probably isn't needed. I'll respin the series shortly.Hold on a sec, just spotted another thing to fix.quoted
@@ -352,9 +397,24 @@ void __init kasan_init(void) shadow_cpu_entry_end = (void *)round_up( (unsigned long)shadow_cpu_entry_end, PAGE_SIZE); + /* + * If we're in full vmalloc mode, don't back vmalloc space with early + * shadow pages. Instead, prepopulate pgds/p4ds so they are synced to + * the global table and we can populate the lower levels on demand. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC + kasan_shallow_populate_pgds( + kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)PAGE_OFFSET + MAXMEM),This should be VMALLOC_START, there is no point to allocate pgds for the hole between linear mapping and vmalloc, just waste of memory. It make sense to map early shadow for that hole, because if code dereferences address in that hole we will see the page fault on that address instead of fault on the shadow. So something like this might work: kasan_populate_early_shadow( kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)PAGE_OFFSET + MAXMEM), kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_START)); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC) kasan_shallow_populate_pgds(kasan_mem_to_shadow(VMALLOC_START), kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END)) else kasan_populate_early_shadow(kasan_mem_to_shadow(VMALLOC_START), kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END)); kasan_populate_early_shadow( kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END + 1), shadow_cpu_entry_begin);
Sounds good. It's getting late for me so I'll change and test that and send a respin tomorrow my time. Regards, Daniel