Re: [PATCH 07/29] x86: Restore "text" Program Header with dummy section
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-10 16:46:41
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-10 16:46:41
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:55:40AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
Instead of depending on markings in the section following NOTES to restore the associated Program Header, use a dummy section, as done in other architectures.This is very laconic and after some staring at ld.info, I think you mean this: " If you place a section in one or more segments using ':PHDR', then the linker will place all subsequent allocatable sections which do not specify ':PHDR' in the same segments." but I could be way off. Yes, no? IOW, please write in the commit messages first what the problem is you're addressing.
Yeah, that's much improved. I really struggled to describe this, given how weird the linker script logic is here.
quoted
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S@@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ SECTIONS } :text = 0x9090 NOTES :text :note + .dummy : { *(.dummy) } :text - EXCEPTION_TABLE(16) :text = 0x9090 + EXCEPTION_TABLE(16)This is killing the filler byte but I have a suspicion that'll change eventually to INT3... :)
Yes, though since the exception table isn't executable, filling with 0x90 has no meaning, and I think when I looked at the alignment there were actually no fill bytes from here on. But it doesn't matter; it all goes away in the end. -- Kees Cook