Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 4 authors, 2019-10-11

Re: [PATCH 07/29] x86: Restore "text" Program Header with dummy section

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-10 16:46:41
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:55:40AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
Instead of depending on markings in the section following NOTES to
restore the associated Program Header, use a dummy section, as done
in other architectures.
This is very laconic and after some staring at ld.info, I think you mean
this:

"   If you place a section in one or more segments using ':PHDR', then
the linker will place all subsequent allocatable sections which do not
specify ':PHDR' in the same segments."

but I could be way off. Yes, no?

IOW, please write in the commit messages first what the problem is
you're addressing.
Yeah, that's much improved. I really struggled to describe this, given
how weird the linker script logic is here.
quoted
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ SECTIONS
 	} :text = 0x9090
 
 	NOTES :text :note
+	.dummy : { *(.dummy) } :text
 
-	EXCEPTION_TABLE(16) :text = 0x9090
+	EXCEPTION_TABLE(16)
This is killing the filler byte but I have a suspicion that'll change
eventually to INT3... :)
Yes, though since the exception table isn't executable, filling with
0x90 has no meaning, and I think when I looked at the alignment there
were actually no fill bytes from here on. But it doesn't matter; it all
goes away in the end.

-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help