Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2019-09-25

Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] mm/debug: Add tests for architecture exported page table helpers

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-25 03:36:19
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, sparclinux


On 09/24/2019 06:01 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:51:01PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:03:21PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
quoted
This series adds a test validation for architecture exported page table
helpers. Patch in the series adds basic transformation tests at various
levels of the page table. Before that it exports gigantic page allocation
function from HugeTLB.

This test was originally suggested by Catalin during arm64 THP migration
RFC discussion earlier. Going forward it can include more specific tests
with respect to various generic MM functions like THP, HugeTLB etc and
platform specific tests.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190628102003.GA56463@arrakis.emea.arm.com/ (local)

Testing:

Successfully build and boot tested on both arm64 and x86 platforms without
any test failing. Only build tested on some other platforms. Build failed
on some platforms (known) in pud_clear_tests() as there were no available
__pgd() definitions.

- ARM32
- IA64
Hm. Grep shows __pgd() definitions for both of them. Is it for specific
config?
 
For ARM32 it's defined only for 3-lelel page tables, i.e with LPAE on.
For IA64 it's defined for !STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS which is even not a config
option, but a define in arch/ia64/include/asm/page.h
Right. So now where we go from here ! We will need help from platform folks to
fix this unless its trivial. I did propose this on last thread (v2), wondering if
it will be a better idea to restrict DEBUG_ARCH_PGTABLE_TEST among architectures
which have fixed all pending issues whether build or run time. Though enabling all
platforms where the test builds at the least might make more sense, we might have
to just exclude arm32 and ia64 for now. Then run time problems can be fixed later
platform by platform. Any thoughts ?

BTW the test is known to run successfully on arm64, x86, ppc32 platforms. Gerald
has been trying to get it working on s390. in the meantime., if there are other
volunteers to test this on ppc64, sparc, riscv, mips, m68k etc platforms, it will
be really helpful.

- Anshuman
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help