On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 19:03 +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
On 2019/8/28 12:54, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:07:54PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
quoted
+/*
+ * To see if we need to relocate the kernel to a random offset
+ * void *dt_ptr - address of the device tree
+ * phys_addr_t size - size of the first memory block
+ */
+notrace void __init kaslr_early_init(void *dt_ptr, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+ unsigned long tlb_virt;
+ phys_addr_t tlb_phys;
+ unsigned long offset;
+ unsigned long kernel_sz;
+
+ kernel_sz = (unsigned long)_end - KERNELBASE;
Why KERNELBASE and not kernstart_addr?
Did you mean kernstart_virt_addr? It should be kernstart_virt_addr.
Yes, kernstart_virt_addr. KERNELBASE will be incorrect if the kernel was
loaded at a nonzero physical address without CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START being
adjusted to match.
-Scott