[PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2019-07-04
[PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next() · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2019-07-04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next() · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2019-08-30
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next() · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2019-08-30
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next() · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2019-09-04
[PATCH 2/2] ftrace: Check for successful allocation of hash · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2019-07-04
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2019-08-08
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2019-08-08
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2019-08-30

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2019-08-08 15:17:55
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 20:45:04 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" [off-list ref] wrote:

Naveen N. Rao wrote:

quoted

Two patches addressing bugs in ftrace function probe handling. The first 
patch addresses a NULL pointer dereference reported by LTP tests, while 
the second one is a trivial patch to address a missing check for return 
value, found by code inspection.

Steven,
Can you please take a look at these patches?

Thanks for the ping. Yes I will.

-- Steve

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help