Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] writes:

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
index b310a9c18113..f2e399fb626b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h

@@ -21,23 +21,11 @@
 
 #else	/* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
 
-#define sme_me_mask	0ULL
-
-static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }

You want to move out sev_active as well, the only relevant thing is
mem_encrypt_active(). Everything SME/SEV is an architecture detail.

I'm sure you saw it. I addressed sev_active in a separate patch.

Thanks for reviewing this series!

quoted

+static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }

Thanks,

	tglx

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center