Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2019-08-10

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Make boot look nice(r)

From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-05-16 06:10:03

Christophe Leroy's on May 16, 2019 2:47 pm:

Le 16/05/2019 à 04:04, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
quoted
Radix boot looks like this:

  -----------------------------------------------------
  phys_mem_size     = 0x200000000
  dcache_bsize      = 0x80
  icache_bsize      = 0x80
  cpu_features      = 0x0000c06f8f5fb1a7
    possible        = 0x0000fbffcf5fb1a7
    always          = 0x00000003800081a1
  cpu_user_features = 0xdc0065c2 0xaee00000
  mmu_features      = 0xbc006041
  firmware_features = 0x0000000010000000
  hash-mmu: ppc64_pft_size    = 0x0
  hash-mmu: kernel vmalloc start   = 0xc008000000000000
  hash-mmu: kernel IO start        = 0xc00a000000000000
  hash-mmu: kernel vmemmap start   = 0xc00c000000000000
  -----------------------------------------------------

Fix:

  -----------------------------------------------------
  phys_mem_size     = 0x200000000
  dcache_bsize      = 0x80
  icache_bsize      = 0x80
  cpu_features      = 0x0000c06f8f5fb1a7
    possible        = 0x0000fbffcf5fb1a7
    always          = 0x00000003800081a1
  cpu_user_features = 0xdc0065c2 0xaee00000
  mmu_features      = 0xbc006041
  firmware_features = 0x0000000010000000
  vmalloc start     = 0xc008000000000000
  IO start          = 0xc00a000000000000
  vmemmap start     = 0xc00c000000000000
  -----------------------------------------------------

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
I fear your change defeats most of the purpose of commit 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20190515&id=e4dccf9092ab48a6f902003b9558c0e45d0e849a
I think it's still a significant improvement without introducing
the regression :)
As far as I understand, the main issue is the "hash-mmu:" prefix ?
That's due to the following define in top of book3s64/hash_utils.c:

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "hash-mmu: " fmt

Could we simply undef it just before print_system_hash_info() ?
Little bit fragile I think.
Or move print_system_hash_info() in another book3s64 specific file which 
doesn't set pr_fmt ?
print_system_info() would be okay for me and allow getting rid of
that PPC64 config. Although it also needs to go in a file without
pr_fmt I guess that's not so hard.

Thanks,
Nick
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help