On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:26 +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:

On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 15:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:

quoted

-static const char * const phy_types[] = {
-     "emmc 5.0 phy",
-     "emmc 5.1 phy"
-};
-
 enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
      EMMC_5_0_PHY,
      EMMC_5_1_PHY,
      NR_PHY_TYPES

There is no need for NR_PHY_TYPES now so you could remove that as well.

I thought the same.
The only reason to keep NR_PHY_TYPES, is for potential future patches,
where it would be just 1 addition

 enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
      EMMC_5_0_PHY,
      EMMC_5_1_PHY,
+      EMMC_5_2_PHY,
      NR_PHY_TYPES
  }

Depending on style/preference of how to do enums (allow comma on last
enum
or not allow comma on last enum value), adding new enum values woudl be 2
additions + 1 deletion lines.

 enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
      EMMC_5_0_PHY,
-      EMMC_5_1_PHY
+      EMM
C_5_1_PHY,
+      EMMC_5_2_PHY
 }

Either way (leave NR_PHY_TYPES or remove NR_PHY_TYPES) is fine from my
side.

Preference on this ?
If no objection [nobody insists] I would keep.

I don't feel strongly about it [dropping NR_PHY_TYPES or not].

Thanks
Alex

Thanks
Alex

quoted

regards,
dan carpenter