Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes

[PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-12
[PATCH 1/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-12
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Barret Rhoden <hidden> · 2019-05-01
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-05-02
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-06-26
[PATCH 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-12
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · kbuild test robot <hidden> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · kbuild test robot <hidden> · 2019-02-13
[PATCH v2 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-13
[PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Dave Hansen <hidden> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: be more verbose about zonelist initialization · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-13
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2019-02-12
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-02-26
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-04-15
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Dave Hansen <hidden> · 2019-04-15
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes · Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> · 2019-04-16

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-05-02 13:00:37
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Wed 01-05-19 15:12:32, Barret Rhoden wrote:
[...]

A more elegant solution may be to avoid registering with sysfs during early
boot, or something else entirely.  But I figured I'd ask for help at this
point.  =)

Thanks for the report and an excellent analysis! This is really helpful.
I will think about this some more but I am traveling this week. It seems
really awkward to register a sysfs file for an empty range. That looks
like a bug to me.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help