Re: [PATCH v13 00/10] powerpc: Switch to CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-24 09:43:54
Also in:
lkml
On 01/24/2019 01:06 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Le 12/01/2019 à 10:55, Christophe Leroy a écrit :quoted
The purpose of this serie is to activate CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK which moves the thread_info into task_struct. Moving thread_info into task_struct has the following advantages: - It protects thread_info from corruption in the case of stack overflows. - Its address is harder to determine if stack addresses are leaked, making a number of attacks more difficult.I ran null_syscall and context_switch benchmark selftests and the result is surprising. There is slight degradation in context_switch and a significant one on null_syscall: Without the serie: ~# chrt -f 98 ./context_switch --no-altivec --no-vector --no-fp 55542 55562 55564 55562 55568 ... ~# ./null_syscall 2546.71 ns 336.17 cycles With the serie: ~# chrt -f 98 ./context_switch --no-altivec --no-vector --no-fp 55138 55142 55152 55144 55142 ~# ./null_syscall 3479.54 ns 459.30 cycles So 0,8% less context switches per second and 37% more time for one syscall ? Any idea ?What platform is that on?
It is on the 8xx
On 64-bit we have to turn one mtmsrd into two and that's obviously a slow down. But I don't see that you've done anything similar in 32-bit code. I assume it's patch 8 that causes the slow down?
I have not digged into it yet, but why patch 8 ?
I run null_syscall with perf, and I get the following. Can we conclude
on something with that ?
Without the serie:
# Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ............ ............ .................
........................................
#
32.95% 46375 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k] DoSyscall
23.64% 33275 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
__task_pid_nr_ns
15.47% 21778 null_syscall libc-2.23.so [.]
__GI___getppid
8.92% 12556 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
__rcu_read_unlock
5.69% 8014 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sys_getppid
4.01% 5643 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
__rcu_read_lock
3.67% 5166 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
syscall_dotrace_cont
2.52% 3542 null_syscall null_syscall [.] main
With the serie:
30.04% 56337 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k] DoSyscall
13.89% 26060 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
__rcu_read_unlock
13.36% 25062 null_syscall libc-2.23.so [.]
__GI___getppid
12.73% 23872 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
__task_pid_nr_ns
11.21% 21033 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sys_getppid
8.24% 15457 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
syscall_dotrace_cont
4.38% 8217 null_syscall [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
ret_from_syscall
2.54% 4773 null_syscall null_syscall [.] main
Christophe