Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:01 PM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl     | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl  | 12 ++++++++++++

I have some changes I'd like to make to our syscall table that will
clash with this.

I'll try and send them today.

Ok. Are those for 5.0 or 5.1? If they are intended for 5.0, it would be
nice for me to have a branch based on 5.0-rc1 that I can put
the other patches on top of.

There is also another change that I considered:

At the end of my series, we have a lot of entries like

245     32      clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime32
245     64      clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime
245     spu     clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime

which could be folded into

245     32      clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime32
245     spu64 clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime

if we just add another option to the ABI field. Any thoughts on
that?

My series splits spu out into a separate field. So the above would be:

245     32	-	clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime32
245     64	spu	clock_settime                   sys_clock_settime

cheers