On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:49:21PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
quoted
Hi Mike.
quoted
index c37955d..2a17665 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
@@ -34,16 +34,13 @@
void * __init prom_early_alloc(unsigned long size)
{
- unsigned long paddr = memblock_phys_alloc(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
- void *ret;
+ void *ret = memblock_alloc(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
- if (!paddr) {
+ if (!ret) {
prom_printf("prom_early_alloc(%lu) failed\n", size);
prom_halt();
}
- ret = __va(paddr);
- memset(ret, 0, size);
prom_early_allocated += size;
return ret;
memblock_alloc() calls memblock_alloc_try_nid().
And if allocation fails then memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls panic().
So will we ever hit the prom_halt() code?
memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid() also calls panic if an allocation fails. So
in either case we never reach prom_halt() code.
So we have code here we never reach - not nice.
If the idea is to avoid relying on the panic inside memblock_alloc() then
maybe replace it with a variant that do not call panic?
To make it clear what happens.
Sam