Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf/core: Add macro to test for event exclusion flags
From: Andrew Murray <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-23 14:32:17
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Andrew Murray <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-23 14:32:17
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:28:34PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Andrew Murray [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Add a macro that tests if any of the perf event exclusion flags are set on a given event. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <redacted> --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 53c500f..89ee7fa 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h@@ -1004,6 +1004,15 @@ perf_event__output_id_sample(struct perf_event *event, extern void perf_log_lost_samples(struct perf_event *event, u64 lost); +static inline bool event_has_exclude_flags(struct perf_event *event) +{ + struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr; + + return attr->exclude_idle || attr->exclude_user || + attr->exclude_kernel || attr->exclude_hv || + attr->exclude_guest || attr->exclude_host; +}Sorry to be a total PITA, but using "flags" plural suggests that it only returns true if there is more than one exclude flag set. A better name would be event_has_exclude_flag() or maybe event_has_any_exclude_flag(). If you're doing a respin anyway it'd be nice to fix the name, but obviously it's not high priority.
No problem - I'll go with event_has_any_exclude_flag. Thanks, Andrew Murray
cheers