Re: [RFC PATCH] seccomp: Add protection keys into seccomp_data
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-29 17:10:47
Also in:
linux-api
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-29 17:10:47
Also in:
linux-api
On 10/29/18 10:02 AM, Michael Sammler wrote:
quoted
quoted
Also, I'm not sure the kernel provides the PKRU guarantees you want at the moment. Our implementation *probably* works, but it's mostly by accident.I don't know, which guarantees about the PKRU are provided at the moment, but the only guarantee needed for this patch is, that the kernel does not change the bits of the PKRU register, which belong to pkeys allocated by the user program, between the syscall entry and the call to secure_computing(). Is there are use case where the kernel would like to modify these bits of the PKRU?
We've been talking about doing more lax save/restore of the XSAVE content (PKRU is part of this content). We would, for instance, only restore it when returning to userspace, but PKRU might not be up-to-date with the value in current->fpu. It's not a deal-breaker with your approach, it's just something to be careful of and make sure PKRU is up-to-date before you go use it.