Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2018-10-30

Re: [RFC PATCH] seccomp: Add protection keys into seccomp_data

From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-29 17:10:47
Also in: linux-api

On 10/29/18 10:02 AM, Michael Sammler wrote:
quoted
quoted
Also, I'm not sure the kernel provides the PKRU guarantees you want at
the moment.  Our implementation *probably* works, but it's mostly by
accident.
I don't know, which guarantees about the PKRU are provided at the
moment, but the only guarantee needed for this patch is, that the kernel
does not change the bits of the PKRU register, which belong to pkeys
allocated by the user program, between the syscall entry and the call to
secure_computing(). Is there are use case where the kernel would like to
modify these bits of the PKRU?
We've been talking about doing more lax save/restore of the XSAVE
content (PKRU is part of this content).  We would, for instance, only
restore it when returning to userspace, but PKRU might not be up-to-date
with the value in current->fpu.

It's not a deal-breaker with your approach, it's just something to be
careful of and make sure PKRU is up-to-date before you go use it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help