Re: Stack protector crash in pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self()
From: Segher Boessenkool <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-16 14:26:28
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:21:50AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Looks like a lack of initialisation of the canary for the non-boot CPUs on SMP, you applied this morning the patch I sent you for that. Is the patch in ?Yeah it is. $ git log --oneline 4ffe713b7587 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c 8e8a31d7fd54 powerpc: Use cpu_smallcore_sibling_mask at SMT level on bigcores 425752c63b6f powerpc: Detect the presence of big-cores via "ibm, thread-groups" 7241d26e8175 powerpc/64: properly initialise the stackprotector canary on SMP. It only happens on a specific Power9 machine, not in sim, but it's 100% reproducible on that hardware. The canary value has changed (?!). The value in paca->canary and current->canary agree, but they don't match what's in the stack. Clearly the idle code is doing something I don't understand :)
Did something actually corrupt the stack? Segher