Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: machine check interrupt is a non-maskable interrupt
From: Christophe LEROY <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-11 14:33:23
Le 09/10/2018 à 13:16, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:36:18 +0000 Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10/09/2018 05:30 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:quoted
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 06:46:30 +0200 Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Le 09/10/2018 à 06:32, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :quoted
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 17:39:11 +0200 Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Nick, Le 19/07/2017 à 08:59, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :quoted
Use nmi_enter similarly to system reset interrupts. This uses NMI printk NMI buffers and turns off various debugging facilities that helps avoid tripping on ourselves or other CPUs. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c index 2849c4f50324..6d31f9d7c333 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c@@ -789,8 +789,10 @@ int machine_check_generic(struct pt_regs *regs) void machine_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) { - enum ctx_state prev_state = exception_enter(); int recover = 0; + bool nested = in_nmi(); + if (!nested) + nmi_enter();This alters preempt_count, then when die() is called in_interrupt() returns true allthough the trap didn't happen in interrupt, so oops_end() panics for "fatal exception in interrupt" instead of gently sending SIGBUS the faulting app.Thanks for tracking that down.quoted
Any idea on how to fix this ?I would say we have to deliver the sigbus by hand. if ((user_mode(regs))) _exception(SIGBUS, regs, BUS_MCEERR_AR, regs->nip); else die("Machine check", regs, SIGBUS);And what about all the other things done by 'die()' ? And what if it is a kernel thread ? In one of my boards, I have a kernel thread regularly checking the HW, and if it gets a machine check I expect it to gently stop and the die notification to be delivered to all registered notifiers. Until before this patch, it was working well.I guess the alternative is we could check regs->trap for machine check in the die test. Complication is having to account for MCE in an interrupt handler. if (in_interrupt()) { if (!IS_MCHECK_EXC(regs) || (irq_count() - (NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET))) panic("Fatal exception in interrupt"); } Something like that might work for you? We needs a ppc64 macro for the MCE, and can probably add something like in_nmi_from_interrupt() for the second part of the test.Don't know, I'm away from home on business trip so I won't be able to test anything before next week. However it looks more or less like a hack, doesn't it ?I thought it seemed okay (with the right functions added). Actually it could be a bit nicer to do this, then it works generally : if (in_interrupt()) { if (!in_nmi() || in_nmi_from_interrupt()) panic("Fatal exception in interrupt"); }quoted
What about the following ?Hmm, in some ways maybe it's nicer. One complication is I would like the same thing to be available for platform specific machine check handlers, so then you need to pass is_in_interrupt to them. Which you can do without any problem... But is it cleaner than the above?
For me it looks cleaner than twiddle the preempt_count depending on whether we were or not already in nmi() . Let's draft something and see what it looks like.
I guess one advantage of yours is that a BUG somewhere in the NMI path will panic the system. Or is that a disadvantage?
Why would it panic the system more than now ? And is it an issue at all ? Doesn't BUG() panic in any case ? Christophe