Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 15

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:24:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:12:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:26:37 -0700 Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

ALl ppc qemu tests (including big endian pseries) also generate a warning.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/memblock.c:1301 .memblock_alloc_range_nid+0x20/0x68

That is:

static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
                                        phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start,
                                        phys_addr_t end, int nid,
                                        enum memblock_flags flags)
{
       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!align))
                align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;

Looks like patch

  "memblock: stop using implicit alignment to SMP_CACHE_BYTES"

missed some places ...

To be expected, I guess.  I'm pretty relaxed about this ;) Let's do
another sweep in a week or so, after which we'll have a couple of
months to mop up any leftovers.