Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as
Mike's removing bootmem.
In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal
conflicts with new added uses. :-)
I suppose. Though the last time we added a new include of bootmem.h was
2015, and that should have actually been memblock.h.
quoted
I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is
actually defined anyway.
However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until
after it is removed.
OK. I guess I'll leave it for Andrew to squash in to the series.
cheers