Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] writes:

Hi Michael,

On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as
Mike's removing bootmem.

In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal
conflicts with new added uses.  :-)

I suppose. Though the last time we added a new include of bootmem.h was
2015, and that should have actually been memblock.h.

quoted

I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is
actually defined anyway.

However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until
after it is removed.

OK. I guess I'll leave it for Andrew to squash in to the series.

cheers