On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:20 PM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

@@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
        int ret, busnum = root->secondary.start;
        struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
        int node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
-       struct pci_bus *bus;
-       struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
+       struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;

Why "bridge" and not "host" or even something to stand for "root complex"?

Or maybe it can still be "host_bridge"?

I did this for consistency with the naming in drivers/pci/probe.c,
which always declares the local variable as 'struct pci_host_bridge *bridge'.
It's easy to change here if you feel strongly about it (I don't).

I would leave host_bridge here.  It would make the patch smaller too I think.