On 2018/8/14 17:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:

zhong jiang [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an element.
So just replace it.

Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

This code is copied from binutils and we don't want to needlessly cause
it to diverge from the binutils copy.

So thanks but no thanks.

Thank you for clarification.

Sincerely
zhong jiang

cheers

quoted

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
index ac2b55b..f3f57a1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c

@@ -966,8 +966,7 @@
   { 0xff, 11, NULL, NULL, PPC_OPERAND_SIGNOPT },
 };
 
-const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = (sizeof (powerpc_operands)
-					   / sizeof (powerpc_operands[0]));
+const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_operands);
 
 /* The functions used to insert and extract complicated operands.  */
 

@@ -6980,8 +6979,7 @@
 {"fcfidu.",	XRC(63,974,1),	XRA_MASK, POWER7|PPCA2,	PPCVLE,		{FRT, FRB}},
 };
 
-const int powerpc_num_opcodes =
-  sizeof (powerpc_opcodes) / sizeof (powerpc_opcodes[0]);
+const int powerpc_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_opcodes);
 

quoted

 /* The VLE opcode table.
 

@@ -7219,8 +7217,7 @@
 {"se_bl",	BD8(58,0,1),	BD8_MASK,	PPCVLE,	0,		{B8}},
 };
 
-const int vle_num_opcodes =
-  sizeof (vle_opcodes) / sizeof (vle_opcodes[0]);
+const int vle_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(vle_opcodes);
 

quoted

 /* The macro table.  This is only used by the assembler.  */
 

@@ -7288,5 +7285,4 @@
 {"e_clrlslwi",4, PPCVLE, "e_rlwinm %0,%1,%3,(%2)-(%3),31-(%3)"},
 };
 
-const int powerpc_num_macros =
-  sizeof (powerpc_macros) / sizeof (powerpc_macros[0]);
+const int powerpc_num_macros = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_macros);

-- 
1.7.12.4

.