Thread (39 messages) flat view 39 messages, 2 authors, 2018-07-18

Re: [PATCH v14 14/22] selftests/vm: Introduce generic abstractions

From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-18 16:38:20
Also in: linux-arch, linux-kselftest, linux-mm

On 07/17/2018 06:49 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
Introduce generic abstractions and provide architecture
specific implementation for the abstractions.
I really wanted to see these two things separated:
1. introduce abstractions
2. introduce ppc implementation

But, I guess most of it is done except for the siginfo stuff.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
 #include "pkey-x86.h"
+#elif defined(__powerpc64__) /* arch */
+#include "pkey-powerpc.h"
 #else /* arch */
 #error Architecture not supported
 #endif /* arch */
@@ -186,7 +191,16 @@ static inline int open_hugepage_file(int flag)
 
 static inline int get_start_key(void)
 {
-	return 1;
+	return 0;
+}
How does this not now break x86?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 #endif /* _PKEYS_X86_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 304f74f..18e1bb7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -197,17 +197,18 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
 
 int pkey_faults;
 int last_si_pkey = -1;
+void pkey_access_allow(int pkey);
Please just move the function.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 {
 	ucontext_t *uctxt = vucontext;
 	int trapno;
 	unsigned long ip;
 	char *fpregs;
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
 	pkey_reg_t *pkey_reg_ptr;
-	u64 siginfo_pkey;
+#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
+	u32 siginfo_pkey;
 	u32 *si_pkey_ptr;
-	int pkey_reg_offset;
-	fpregset_t fpregset;
 
 	dprint_in_signal = 1;
 	dprintf1(">>>>===============SIGSEGV============================\n");
@@ -217,12 +218,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 
 	trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO];
 	ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX];
-	fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
-	fpregs = (void *)fpregset;
+	fpregs = (char *) uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
 
 	dprintf2("%s() trapno: %d ip: 0x%016lx info->si_code: %s/%d\n",
 			__func__, trapno, ip, si_code_str(si->si_code),
 			si->si_code);
+
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
+
 #ifdef __i386__
 	/*
 	 * 32-bit has some extra padding so that userspace can tell whether
@@ -230,20 +233,21 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 	 * state.  We just assume that it is here.
 	 */
 	fpregs += 0x70;
-#endif
-	pkey_reg_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset();
-	pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_offset]);
+#endif /* __i386__ */
 
-	dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si);
-	dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs);
+	pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_xstate_offset()]);
There are unnecessary parenthesis here.

Also, why are you bothering to mess with this?  This is inside the x86
#ifdef, right?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	/*
-	 * If we got a PKEY fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in
+	 * If we got a key fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in
 	 * here.
 	 */
 	dprintf1("pkey_reg_xstate_offset: %d\n", pkey_reg_xstate_offset());
 	if (DEBUG_LEVEL > 4)
 		dump_mem(pkey_reg_ptr - 128, 256);
 	pkey_assert(*pkey_reg_ptr);
+#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
+
+	dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si);
+	dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs);
 
 	if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
@@ -252,22 +256,28 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		exit(4);
 	}
 
-	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+	si_pkey_ptr = siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(si);
 	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
-	dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
+	dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
You removed the cast here, why?  That changes the pointer math.

Can we merge this as-is.  No, I do not think we can.  If it were _just_
the #ifdefs, we could let it pass, but there are a bunch of rough spots,
not just the #ifdefs.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help