Re: [PATCH 6/7] powerpc/traps: Print signal name for unhandled signals
From: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-25 20:06:45
Also in:
lkml
Hi, Christophe. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:49:27PM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araujo [off-list ref] a écrit :quoted
This adds a human-readable name in the unhandled signal message. Before this patch, a page fault looked like: Jul 11 16:04:11 localhost kernel: pandafault[6303]: unhandled signal 11 at 00000000100007d0 nip 000000001000061c lr 00007fff93c55100 code 2 in pandafault[10000000+10000] After this patch, a page fault looks like: Jul 11 18:14:48 localhost kernel: pandafault[6352]: segfault (11) at 000000013a2a09f8 nip 000000013a2a086c lr 00007fffb63e5100 code 2 in pandafault[13a2a0000+10000] Signed-off-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c index e6c43ef9fb50..e55ee639d010 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c@@ -96,6 +96,41 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__debugger_fault_handler); #define TM_DEBUG(x...) do { } while(0) #endif +static const char *signames[SIGRTMIN + 1] = { + "UNKNOWN", + "SIGHUP", // 1 + "SIGINT", // 2 + "SIGQUIT", // 3 + "SIGILL", // 4 + "unhandled trap", // 5 = SIGTRAP + "SIGABRT", // 6 = SIGIOT + "bus error", // 7 = SIGBUS + "floating point exception", // 8 = SIGFPE + "illegal instruction", // 9 = SIGILL + "SIGUSR1", // 10 + "segfault", // 11 = SIGSEGV + "SIGUSR2", // 12 + "SIGPIPE", // 13 + "SIGALRM", // 14 + "SIGTERM", // 15 + "SIGSTKFLT", // 16 + "SIGCHLD", // 17 + "SIGCONT", // 18 + "SIGSTOP", // 19 + "SIGTSTP", // 20 + "SIGTTIN", // 21 + "SIGTTOU", // 22 + "SIGURG", // 23 + "SIGXCPU", // 24 + "SIGXFSZ", // 25 + "SIGVTALRM", // 26 + "SIGPROF", // 27 + "SIGWINCH", // 28 + "SIGIO", // 29 = SIGPOLL = SIGLOST + "SIGPWR", // 30 + "SIGSYS", // 31 = SIGUNUSED +}; + /* * Trap & Exception support */@@ -314,10 +349,10 @@ static void show_signal_msg(int signr, structpt_regs *regs, int code, if (!unhandled_signal(current, signr)) return; - pr_info("%s[%d]: unhandled signal %d at "REG_FMT \ - " nip "REG_FMT" lr "REG_FMT" code %x", - current->comm, current->pid, signr, addr, - regs->nip, regs->link, code); + pr_info("%s[%d]: %s (%d) at "REG_FMT" nip "REG_FMT \ + " lr "REG_FMT" code %x", + current->comm, current->pid, signames[signr], + signr, addr, regs->nip, regs->link, code);Are we sure that signr is always within the limits of the table ?
Looking at the code, we only pass the following signals:
SIGBUS
SIGFPE
SIGILL
SIGSEGV
SIGTRAP
All of them are within the limits of the table. We've added other
signals for completeness.
Cheers
Murilo