Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 7 authors, 2018-07-23

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling

From: Finn Thain <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-18 12:02:21
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Thanks for your patch!

Applied and queued for v4.19, with the WARN_ON() dropped.
The patch you've committed to your for-v4.19 branch has this hunk:
@@ -269,8 +275,12 @@ static long via_read_time(void)
                via_pram_command(0x89, &result.cdata[1]);
                via_pram_command(0x8D, &result.cdata[0]);
 
-               if (result.idata == last_result.idata)
+               if (result.idata == last_result.idata) {
+                       if (result.idata < RTC_OFFSET)
+                               result.idata += 0x100000000ull;
+
                        return result.idata - RTC_OFFSET;
+               }
 
                if (++count > 10)
                        break;
That looks bogus to me, since result.idata is a long.

Also, the following hunk seems a bit pointless (?)
@@ -291,11 +301,11 @@ static long via_read_time(void)
  * is basically any machine with Mac II-style ADB.
  */
 
-static void via_write_time(long time)
+static void via_write_time(time64_t time)
 {
        union {
                __u8 cdata[4];
-               long idata;
+               __u32 idata;
        } data;
        __u8 temp;
 
But if data.idata needs to be changed to __u32 here, why not change the 
same struct member in via_read_time() also?

-- 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help