Re: [PATCH kernel 6/6] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Allocate indirect TCE levels on demand
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-14 06:35:25
Also in:
kvm
On 12/6/18 2:17 pm, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 03:46:33PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:quoted
At the moment we allocate the entire TCE table, twice (hardware part and userspace translation cache). This normally works as we normally have contigous memory and the guest will map entire RAM for 64bit DMA. However if we have sparse RAM (one example is a memory device), then we will allocate TCEs which will never be used as the guest only maps actual memory for DMA. If it is a single level TCE table, there is nothing we can really do but if it a multilevel table, we can skip allocating TCEs we know we won't need. This adds ability to allocate only first level, saving memory. This changes iommu_table::free() to avoid allocating of an extra level; iommu_table::set() will do this when needed. This adds @alloc parameter to iommu_table::exchange() to tell the callback if it can allocate an extra level; the flag is set to "false" for the realmode KVM handlers of H_PUT_TCE hcalls and the callback returns H_TOO_HARD. This still requires the entire table to be counted in mm::locked_vm. To be conservative, this only does on-demand allocation when the usespace cache table is requested which is the case of VFIO. The example math for a system replicating a powernv setup with NVLink2 in a guest: 16GB RAM mapped at 0x0 128GB GPU RAM window (16GB of actual RAM) mapped at 0x244000000000 the table to cover that all with 64K pages takes: (((0x244000000000 + 0x2000000000) >> 16)*8)>>20 = 4556MB If we allocate only necessary TCE levels, we will only need: (((0x400000000 + 0x400000000) >> 16)*8)>>20 = 4MB (plus some for indirect levels). Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h | 7 ++- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 6 ++- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c | 4 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda-tce.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++------- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 8 ++-- drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h index 4bdcf22..daa3ee5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct iommu_table_ops { unsigned long *hpa, enum dma_data_direction *direction); - __be64 *(*useraddrptr)(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index); + __be64 *(*useraddrptr)(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, bool alloc); #endif void (*clear)(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, long npages);@@ -122,10 +122,13 @@ struct iommu_table { __be64 *it_userspace; /* userspace view of the table */ struct iommu_table_ops *it_ops; struct kref it_kref; + int it_nid; }; +#define IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY_RM(tbl, entry) \ + ((tbl)->it_ops->useraddrptr((tbl), (entry), false))Is real mode really the only case where you want to inhibit new allocations? I would have thought some paths would be read-only and you wouldn't want to allocate, even in virtual mode.
There are paths when I do not want allocation but I can figure out that from dma direction flag, for example, I am cleaning up the table and I do not want any extra allocation to happen there and they do happen because I made a mistake so I'll repost. Other than that, this @alloc flag is for real mode only.
quoted
#define IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY(tbl, entry) \ - ((tbl)->it_ops->useraddrptr((tbl), (entry))) + ((tbl)->it_ops->useraddrptr((tbl), (entry), true)) /* Pure 2^n version of get_order */ static inline __attribute_const__diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h index 5e02408..1fa5590 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h@@ -267,8 +267,10 @@ extern int pnv_tce_build(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, long npages, unsigned long attrs); extern void pnv_tce_free(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, long npages); extern int pnv_tce_xchg(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, - unsigned long *hpa, enum dma_data_direction *direction); -extern __be64 *pnv_tce_useraddrptr(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index); + unsigned long *hpa, enum dma_data_direction *direction, + bool alloc); +extern __be64 *pnv_tce_useraddrptr(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, + bool alloc); extern unsigned long pnv_tce_get(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index); extern long pnv_pci_ioda2_table_alloc_pages(int nid, __u64 bus_offset,diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c index db0490c..05b4865 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static long kvmppc_rm_tce_iommu_mapped_dec(struct kvm *kvm, { struct mm_iommu_table_group_mem_t *mem = NULL; const unsigned long pgsize = 1ULL << tbl->it_page_shift; - __be64 *pua = IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY(tbl, entry); + __be64 *pua = IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY_RM(tbl, entry); if (!pua) /* it_userspace allocation might be delayed */@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static long kvmppc_rm_tce_iommu_do_map(struct kvm *kvm, struct iommu_table *tbl, { long ret; unsigned long hpa = 0; - __be64 *pua = IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY(tbl, entry); + __be64 *pua = IOMMU_TABLE_USERSPACE_ENTRY_RM(tbl, entry); struct mm_iommu_table_group_mem_t *mem; if (!pua)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda-tce.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda-tce.c index 36c2eb0..a7debfb 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda-tce.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda-tce.c@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static __be64 *pnv_alloc_tce_level(int nid, unsigned int shift) return addr; } -static __be64 *pnv_tce(struct iommu_table *tbl, bool user, long idx) +static __be64 *pnv_tce(struct iommu_table *tbl, bool user, long idx, bool alloc) { __be64 *tmp = user ? tbl->it_userspace : (__be64 *) tbl->it_base; int level = tbl->it_indirect_levels;@@ -57,7 +57,20 @@ static __be64 *pnv_tce(struct iommu_table *tbl, bool user, long idx) while (level) { int n = (idx & mask) >> (level * shift); - unsigned long tce = be64_to_cpu(tmp[n]); + unsigned long tce; + + if (tmp[n] == 0) { + __be64 *tmp2; + + if (!alloc) + return NULL; + + tmp2 = pnv_alloc_tce_level(tbl->it_nid, + ilog2(tbl->it_level_size) + 3);What if the allocation fails?
Fair question, this needs to be handled with at least H_TOO_HARD and real mode and H_HARDWARE in virtual, I'll fix. -- Alexey