Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: lockless tlbie for HPT hcalls
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 03:54:00
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:04:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: [snip]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
OK good, in commit: c17b98cf6028 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Remove code for PPC970 processors") (Dec 2014) So we should be able to do the patch below. cheersdiff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 17498e9a26e4..7756b0c6da75 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ struct kvm_arch { unsigned long host_lpcr; unsigned long sdr1; unsigned long host_sdr1; - int tlbie_lock; unsigned long lpcr; unsigned long vrma_slb_v; int mmu_ready;diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c index 78e6a392330f..89d909b3b881 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c@@ -434,24 +434,6 @@ static inline int is_mmio_hpte(unsigned long v, unsigned long r) (HPTE_R_KEY_HI | HPTE_R_KEY_LO)); } -static inline int try_lock_tlbie(unsigned int *lock) -{ - unsigned int tmp, old; - unsigned int token = LOCK_TOKEN; - - asm volatile("1:lwarx %1,0,%2\n" - " cmpwi cr0,%1,0\n" - " bne 2f\n" - " stwcx. %3,0,%2\n" - " bne- 1b\n" - " isync\n" - "2:" - : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (old) - : "r" (lock), "r" (token) - : "cc", "memory"); - return old == 0; -} - static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rbvalues, long npages, int global, bool need_sync) {@@ -463,8 +445,6 @@ static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rbvalues, * the RS field, this is backwards-compatible with P7 and P8. */ if (global) { - while (!try_lock_tlbie(&kvm->arch.tlbie_lock)) - cpu_relax(); if (need_sync) asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory"); for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i) {@@ -483,7 +463,6 @@ static void do_tlbies(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rbvalues, } asm volatile("eieio; tlbsync; ptesync" : : : "memory"); - kvm->arch.tlbie_lock = 0; } else { if (need_sync) asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
Seems reasonable; is that a patch submission? :) Paul.