@@ -407,9 +414,6 @@ static bool pkey_access_permitted(int pkey, bool write, bool execute) int pkey_shift; u64 amr;- if (!pkey)- return true;- if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey)) return true;
Looks fine to me. Obviously doesn't have any impact on x86 or the
generic code.
One question, though. Which other check makes up for this removed !pkey
check?