Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/lib: optimise PPC32 memcmp
From: Christophe LEROY <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-25 05:55:54
Also in:
lkml
Le 24/05/2018 à 19:24, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
At the time being, memcmp() compares two chunks of memory byte per byte. This patch optimises the comparison by comparing word by word. A small benchmark performed on an 8xx comparing two chuncks of 512 bytes performed 100000 times gives: Before : 5852274 TB ticks After: 1488638 TB ticksquoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/string_32.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/string_32.S index 40a576d56ac7..542e6cecbcaf 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/string_32.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/string_32.S@@ -16,17 +16,45 @@ .text _GLOBAL(memcmp) - cmpwi cr0, r5, 0 - beq- 2f - mtctr r5 - addi r6,r3,-1 - addi r4,r4,-1 -1: lbzu r3,1(r6) - lbzu r0,1(r4) - subf. r3,r0,r3 - bdnzt 2,1b + srawi. r7, r5, 2 /* Divide len by 4 */ + mr r6, r3 + beq- 3f + mtctr r7 + li r7, 0 +1: +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + lwbrx r3, r6, r7 + lwbrx r0, r4, r7 +#else + lwzx r3, r6, r7 + lwzx r0, r4, r7 +#endifYou don't test whether the pointers are word-aligned. Does that work?
copy_tofrom_user() word-aligns the store address and doesn't take care of the load address, so I believe it works. Now, I just read in the MPC885 Ref Manual that unaligned access generates alignment exception when the processor is running in LE mode. Ref. made to the discussion on patch "powerpc/32be: use stmw/lmw for registers save/restore in asm" (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/899465/), I will drop the handling for LE mode. Christophe
Say, when a load is crossing a page boundary, or segment boundary. Segher