Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 5 authors, 2018-05-16

Re: [PATCH v10 09/25] mm: protect VMA modifications using VMA sequence count

From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-04-23 07:19:54
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:33:15PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The VMA sequence count has been introduced to allow fast detection of
VMA modification when running a page fault handler without holding
the mmap_sem.

This patch provides protection against the VMA modification done in :
	- madvise()
	- mpol_rebind_policy()
	- vma_replace_policy()
	- change_prot_numa()
	- mlock(), munlock()
	- mprotect()
	- mmap_region()
	- collapse_huge_page()
	- userfaultd registering services

In addition, VMA fields which will be read during the speculative fault
path needs to be written using WRITE_ONCE to prevent write to be split
and intermediate values to be pushed to other CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <redacted>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |  5 ++++-
 fs/userfaultfd.c   | 17 +++++++++++++----
 mm/khugepaged.c    |  3 +++
 mm/madvise.c       |  6 +++++-
 mm/mempolicy.c     | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 mm/mlock.c         | 13 ++++++++-----
 mm/mmap.c          | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 mm/mprotect.c      |  4 +++-
 mm/swap_state.c    |  8 ++++++--
 9 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index c486ad4b43f0..aeb417f28839 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1136,8 +1136,11 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 					goto out_mm;
 				}
 				for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
-					vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_SOFTDIRTY;
+					vm_write_begin(vma);
+					WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags,
+						   vma->vm_flags & ~VM_SOFTDIRTY);
 					vma_set_page_prot(vma);
+					vm_write_end(vma);
trivial:

I think It's tricky to maintain that VMA fields to be read during SPF should be
(READ|WRITE_ONCE). I think we need some accessor to read/write them rather than
raw accessing like like vma_set_page_prot. Maybe spf prefix would be helpful. 

	vma_spf_set_value(vma, vm_flags, val);

We also add some markers in vm_area_struct's fileds to indicate that
people shouldn't access those fields directly.

Just a thought.

 				}
 				downgrade_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index fe079756bb18..8a8a402ed59f 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -575,6 +575,10 @@ static unsigned long swapin_nr_pages(unsigned long offset)
  * the readahead.
  *
  * Caller must hold down_read on the vma->vm_mm if vmf->vma is not NULL.
+ * This is needed to ensure the VMA will not be freed in our back. In the case
+ * of the speculative page fault handler, this cannot happen, even if we don't
+ * hold the mmap_sem. Callees are assumed to take care of reading VMA's fields
I guess reader would be curious on *why* is safe with SPF.
Comment about the why could be helpful for reviewer.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ * using READ_ONCE() to read consistent values.
  */
 struct page *swap_cluster_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 				struct vm_fault *vmf)
@@ -668,9 +672,9 @@ static inline void swap_ra_clamp_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				     unsigned long *start,
 				     unsigned long *end)
 {
-	*start = max3(lpfn, PFN_DOWN(vma->vm_start),
+	*start = max3(lpfn, PFN_DOWN(READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)),
 		      PFN_DOWN(faddr & PMD_MASK));
-	*end = min3(rpfn, PFN_DOWN(vma->vm_end),
+	*end = min3(rpfn, PFN_DOWN(READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end)),
 		    PFN_DOWN((faddr & PMD_MASK) + PMD_SIZE));
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help