On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:14:39 -0300
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Michael,
=20
On 03/13/2018 08:39 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:

quoted

quoted

I agree; the 'Using fallback displacement flush' message is
misleading (is the system slower/fallback or not? =C3=94_o) =20

=20

quoted

That message is actually just wrong.
=20
It still prints that even if enable=3Dfalse.
=20
So we should change all those messages, perhaps:
=20
	pr_info("rfi-flush: fallback displacement flush
available\n"); pr_info("rfi-flush: ori type flush available\n");
	pr_info("rfi-flush: mttrig type flush available\n"); =20

=20
Indeed.

Maybe it would make more sense to move the messages to the function
that actually patches in the instructions?

Thanks

Michal