Re: [PATCH v9 06/24] mm: make pte_unmap_same compatible with SPF
From: Laurent Dufour <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-28 08:28:07
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 27/03/2018 23:18, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 2f3e98edc94a..b6432a261e63 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h@@ -1199,6 +1199,7 @@ static inline void clear_page_pfmemalloc(struct page *page) #define VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC 0x2000 /* ->fault did not modify page tables * and needs fsync() to complete (for * synchronous page faults in DAX) */ +#define VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME 0x4000 /* Page table entries have changed */ #define VM_FAULT_ERROR (VM_FAULT_OOM | VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV | \ VM_FAULT_HWPOISON | VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE | \diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 21b1212a0892..4bc7b0bdcb40 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c@@ -2309,21 +2309,29 @@ static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf) * parts, do_swap_page must check under lock before unmapping the pte and * proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check; * and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on). + * + * pte_unmap_same() returns: + * 0 if the PTE are the same + * VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME if the PTE are different + * VM_FAULT_RETRY if the VMA has changed in our back during + * a speculative page fault handling. */ -static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, - pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte) +static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf) { - int same = 1; + int ret = 0; + #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { - spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); - spin_lock(ptl); - same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte); - spin_unlock(ptl); + if (pte_spinlock(vmf)) { + if (!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) + ret = VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME; + spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); + } else + ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY; } #endif - pte_unmap(page_table); - return same; + pte_unmap(vmf->pte); + return ret; } static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)@@ -2913,7 +2921,8 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) int exclusive = 0; int ret = 0;Initialization is now unneeded.
I'm sorry, what "initialization" are you talking about here ?
Otherwise: Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Thanks, Laurent.