-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@lst.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 13:11
=20
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:41:56AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
quoted
Sorry for asking a trivial question - looking into dma_configure() I se=
e that
quoted
PCI is used in the start and the end of the API.
In the end part pci_put_host_bridge_device() is called.
So are two bus callbacks something like 'dma_config_start' &
'dma_config_end'
quoted
will be required where the former one will return "dma_dev"?
=20
I'd just use dma_configure as the callback.
This would be a decent stuff.
=20
Currently the of_dma_configure and acpi_dma_configure are only used
for PCI anyway, as no one else sets a non-NULL dma dev.
My understanding is that even the platform bus uses the of_dma_configure
and probably acpi_dma_configure too. So platform bus may also need the
callback implemented. Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
I will submit the patch with 'dma_configure' callback implemented for
the busses shortly.
For fsl-mc I suspect only of_dma_configure is relevanet, so just call tha=
t directly.
If at some point we get enough busses with either OF or ACPI we could
create a helper called from ->dma_configure for that.
Totally agree with this.
Thanks,
Nipun