Re: POWER: Unexpected fault when writing to brk-allocated memory
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-06 06:18:18
Also in:
linux-mm
Nicholas Piggin [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:05:20 +0100 Florian Weimer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
We are seeing an issue on ppc64le and ppc64 (and perhaps on some arm variant, but I have not seen it on our own builders) where running localedef as part of the glibc build crashes with a segmentation fault. Kernel version is 4.13.9 (Fedora 26 variant). I have only seen this with an explicit loader invocation, like this: while I18NPATH=. /lib64/ld64.so.1 /usr/bin/localedef --alias-file=../intl/locale.alias --no-archive -i locales/nl_AW -c -f charmaps/UTF-8 --prefix=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glibc-2.26-16.fc27.ppc64 nl_AW ; do : ; done To be run in the localedata subdirectory of a glibc *source* tree, after a build. You may have to create the /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glibc-2.26-16.fc27.ppc64/usr/lib/locale directory. I have only reproduced this inside a Fedora 27 chroot on a Fedora 26 host, but there it does not matter if you run the old (chroot) or newly built binary. I filed this as a glibc bug for tracking: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22390 There's an strace log and a coredump from the crash. I think the data shows that the address in question should be writable. The crossed 0x0000800000000000 binary is very suggestive. I think that based on the operation of glibc's malloc, this write would be the first time this happens during the lifetime of the process. Does that ring any bells? Is there anything I can do to provide more data? The host is an LPAR with a stock Fedora 26 kernel, so I can use any diagnostics tool which is provided by Fedora.There was a recent change to move to 128TB address space by default, and option for 512TB addresses if explicitly requested. Your brk request asked for > 128TB which the kernel gave it, but the address limit in the paca that the SLB miss tests against was not updated to reflect the switch to 512TB address space.
We should not return that address, unless we requested with a hint value of > 128TB. IIRC we discussed this early during the mmap interface change and said, we will return an address > 128T only if the hint address is above 128TB (not hint addr + length). I am not sure why we are finding us returning and address > 128TB with paca limit set to 128TB?
Why is your brk starting so high? Are you trying to test the > 128TB case, or maybe something is confused by the 64->128TB change? What's the strace look like if you run on a distro or <= 4.10 kernel? Something like the following patch may help if you could test. Thanks, Nick
-aneesh