On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:02:06PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
----- On Oct 5, 2017, at 8:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:37:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b0d79a5f5981
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c
quoted
+void membarrier_arch_register_private_expedited(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ if (get_nr_threads(p) == 1) {
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED);
+ return;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Coherence of TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED against thread
+ * fork is protected by siglock.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&p->sighand->siglock);
+ for_each_thread(p, t)
+ set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(t),
+ TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED);
I'm not sure this works correctly vs CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD.
The intent here is to hold the sighand siglock to provide mutual
exclusion against invocation of membarrier_fork(p, clone_flags)
by copy_process().
copy_process() grabs spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock) for both
CLONE_THREAD and not CLONE_THREAD flags.
What am I missing here ?
If you do CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD you'll end up sharing the mm but
you'll not be part of thread_head, so the for_each_thread() iteration
will not find the task.