Thread (33 messages) flat view 33 messages, 5 authors, 2017-08-25

Re: [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/mm: Optimize detection of thread local mm's

From: Frederic Barrat <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-22 13:18:12


Le 21/08/2017 à 19:35, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 19:27 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
quoted
Hi Ben,

Le 24/07/2017 à 06:28, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
quoted
Instead of comparing the whole CPU mask every time, let's
keep a counter of how many bits are set in the mask. Thus
testing for a local mm only requires testing if that counter
is 1 and the current CPU bit is set in the mask.

I'm trying to see if we could merge this patch with what I'm trying to
do to mark a context as requiring global TLBIs.
In http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/796775/
I'm introducing a 'flags' per memory context, using one bit to say if
the context needs global TLBIs.
The 2 could co-exist, just checking... Do you think about using the
actual active_cpus count down the road, or is it just a matter of
knowing if there are more than one active cpus?
Or you could just incrementer my counter. Just make sure you increment
it at most once per CXL context and decrement when the context is gone.
Ah great, I didn't dare messing with your counter, it makes it easier. 
Arguably what happens on those accelerators is pretty close to an active 
cpu.

Once it is merged, I'm going to have to backport your patch (and an 
update to mine) to the p9-supporting distros. From a quick look, your 
patch, i.e."[PATCH 5/6] powerpc/mm: Optimize detection of thread local 
mm's" is completely independent from the rest of the series, right?

   Fred
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help