Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] mtd: powernv_flash: Use WARN_ON_ONCE() rather than BUG_ON()
From: Cyril Bur <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-18 00:27:28
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 13:33 +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Cyril Bur [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
BUG_ON() should be reserved in situations where we can not longer guarantee the integrity of the system. In the case where powernv_flash_async_op() receives an impossible op, we can still guarantee the integrity of the system. Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <redacted> --- drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c index f5396f26ddb4..a9a20c00687c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static int powernv_flash_async_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, enum flash_op op, rc = opal_flash_erase(info->id, offset, len, token); break; default: - BUG_ON(1); + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return -EIO;Based on the fact that all three values in enum flash_op are handled, I would go as far as stating that the default lemma adds no value and can be removed.
The way I see it is that it isn't doing any harm being there and in cases of future programmer error or during corruption events, that WARN_ON might prove useful.
Frans