On 2017/07/03 12:51PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:27:33 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:05:37 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add a kprobes test to ensure that we are able to add a probe on a
module function using 'p <mod>:<func>' format, without having to
specify a probe name.

Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
---
 .../testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ea7657041ba6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/probe_module.tc

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# description: Kprobe dynamic event - probing module
+
+[ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
+
+echo 0 > events/enable
+echo > kprobe_events
+export MOD=`lsmod | head -n 2 | tail -n 1 | cut -f1 -d" "`
+export FUNC=`grep -m 1 ".* t .*\\[$MOD\\]" /proc/kallsyms | xargs | cut -f3 -d" "`
+[ "x" != "x$MOD" -a "y" != "y$FUNC" ] || exit_untested

Could you also add below case?

echo p:probe_$MOD/$FUNC $MOD/$FUNC > kprobe_events 

Oops, it should be something like

echo "p:test_${MOD}_${FUNC} $MOD/$FUNC" > kprobe_events

since we would like to avoid adding new group name for it.

(Adding new group name should be a separated one.)

Thank you,

quoted

This is for "new event with name on module" case, your one is for "new event without name on module (automatic name generation)"

We should have different test case, because those kicks slightly different parts in kprobe tracer.

Sure. Will make changes to the two tests here and re-spin.

Thanks,
Naveen