Re: powerpc/opal-irqchip: Use interrupt names if present
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2017-06-03 14:04:44
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Hi Ben, On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 14:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c index 998316bf2dad..ecdcba9d1220 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c@@ -183,8 +183,9 @@ void opal_event_shutdown(void) + /* It's not an error for the names to be missing */ + of_property_read_string_array(opal_node, "opal-interrupts-names", + names, opal_irq_count);Just double-checking, as it's different from the standard "interrupt-names": is "opal-interrupts-names" the correct name?Yes, because the property it refers to isn't a standard "interrupts" property... it's ... complicated :-)
I'm aware it's a different property.
It could have been mind you, but the decision for that was made years ago... it's a bunch of interrupts OPAL is interested in, which Linux requests and sets up a handler for which just calls back into OPAL. In any case, firmwares with that property are out now.
Thanks for the confirmation!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds