On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 14:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
index 998316bf2dad..ecdcba9d1220 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
@@ -183,8 +183,9 @@ void opal_event_shutdown(void)
+ /* It's not an error for the names to be missing */
+ of_property_read_string_array(opal_node, "opal-interrupts-names",
+ names, opal_irq_count);
Just double-checking, as it's different from the standard "interrupt-names":
is "opal-interrupts-names" the correct name?
Yes, because the property it refers to isn't a standard "interrupts"
property... it's ... complicated :-)
It could have been mind you, but the decision for that was made years
ago... it's a bunch of interrupts OPAL is interested in, which Linux
requests and sets up a handler for which just calls back into OPAL.
In any case, firmwares with that property are out now.
Cheers,
Ben.