Re: [BUG][next-20170606][bisected 411fe24e6b] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:791
From: Abdul Haleem <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-12 07:22:49
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 15:09 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 12:56:53PM +0530, Abdul Haleem wrote:quoted
Hi, Test: Trinity (https://github.com/kernelslacker/trinity) Machine : Power 8 PowerVM LPAR Kernel : 4.12.0-rc4-next-20170606 gcc : version 5.2.1 config : attached With commit (411fe24e6b : nohz: Fix collision between tick and other hrtimers), a WARNING is seen while running trinity syscall fuzzer In file kernel/time/tick-sched.c at line 791, a WARN_ON_ONCE is being triggered from tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick function. /* Skip reprogram of event if its not changed */ if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) { /* Sanity check: make sure clockevent is actually programmed */ if (likely(dev->next_event <= ts->next_tick)) goto out; WARN_ON_ONCE(1); printk_once("basemono: %llu ts->next_tick: %llu dev->next_event: %llu timer->active: %d timer->expires: %llu\n", basemono, ts->next_tick, dev->next_event, hrtimer_active(&ts->sched_timer), hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer)); } Trace logs: [22934.302780] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [22934.302787] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:791 __tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x2e8/0x570Hi Abdul, Thanks for reporting. I've cooked a fix, any chance you could test it?
Hi Frederic, Thanks for the fix. With given patch on 4.12.0-rc4-next-20170609, test completed with no WARNINGS. Reported-and-tested-by : Abdul Haleem [off-list ref]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-- From f80041b5209aaf9d02ac25a29a248d0f214ba19f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:32:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Fix spurious warning when hrtimer and clocksource get out of sync The sanity check ensuring that the tick expiry cache (ts->next_tick) is actually in sync with the hardware clock (dev->next_event) makes the wrong assumption that the clock can't be programmed later than the hrtimer deadline. In fact the clock hardware can be programmed later on some conditions such as: * The hrtimer deadline is already in the past. * The hrtimer deadline is earlier than the minimum delay supported by the hardware. Such conditions can be met when we program the tick, for example if the last jiffies update hasn't been seen by the current CPU yet, we may program the hrtimer to a deadline that is earlier than ktime_get() because last_jiffies_update is our timestamp base to compute the next tick. As a result, we can randomly observe such warning: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 0 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:794 tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick kernel/time/tick-sched.c:791 [inline] Call Trace: tick_nohz_irq_exit tick_irq_exit irq_exit exiting_irq smp_call_function_interrupt smp_call_function_single_interrupt call_function_single_interrupt Therefore, let's rather make sure that the tick expiry cache is sync'ed with the tick hrtimer deadline, against which it is not supposed to drift away. The clock hardware instead has its own will and can't be used as a reliable comparison point. Reported-by: Sasha Levin <redacted> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <redacted> Cc: James Hartsock <redacted> Cc: Tim Wright <redacted> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted> --- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 9d31f1e..83c788e 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c@@ -768,7 +768,8 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, /* Skip reprogram of event if its not changed */ if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) { /* Sanity check: make sure clockevent is actually programmed */ - if (likely(dev->next_event <= ts->next_tick)) + if (tick == KTIME_MAX || + ts->next_tick == hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer)) goto out; WARN_ON_ONCE(1);@@ -806,8 +807,10 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, goto out; } + hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, tick); + if (ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_HIGHRES) - hrtimer_start(&ts->sched_timer, tick, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED); + hrtimer_start_expires(&ts->sched_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED); else tick_program_event(tick, 1); out:
-- Regard's Abdul Haleem IBM Linux Technology Centre