Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH
From: Murilo Opsfelder Araújo <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 15:33:02
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On 06/08/2017 10:10 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: [...]
The config you attached in the first mail has CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m, here is my confusion. The config from the link below does not have KVM_BOOK3S_64 which selects SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU and which in turn selects VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE. So https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/36ed1ddb05e132aa3cfbb610f0f8402a0774da12 looks correct.
It wasn't me that attached the .config.gz, it was this 0dayci robot.
When CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m, there is no definition of it in autoconf.h, only
CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH_MODULE is defined:
$ grep 'VFIO_SPAPR_EEH' ./include/generated/autoconf.h
#define CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH_MODULE 1
In this case, `#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH` will be false. That's why my v1
patch failed with the 0dayci .config and robot reported back.
This was addressed in my v2 patch using the IS_ENABLED() macro, which checks for
both CONFIG_<name> and CONFIG_<name>_MODULE definitions.
--
Murilo