Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/mm: split store_updates_sp() in two parts in do_page_fault()
From: Christophe LEROY <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-02 09:39:50
Also in:
lkml
From: Christophe LEROY <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-02 09:39:50
Also in:
lkml
Le 02/06/2017 à 11:26, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Only the get_user() in store_updates_sp() has to be done outside the mm semaphore. All the comparison can be done within the semaphore, so only when really needed. As we got a DSI exception, the address pointed by regs->nip is obviously valid, otherwise we would have had a instruction exception. So __get_user() can be used instead of get_user()I don't think that part is true. You took a DSI so there *was* an instruction at NIP, but since then it may have been unmapped by another thread. So I don't think you can assume the get_user() will succeed.
The difference between get_user() and __get_user() is that get_user() performs an access_ok() in addition. Doesn't access_ok() only checks whether addr is below TASK_SIZE to ensure it is a valid user address ? Christophe