Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 5 authors, 2017-06-14

Re: [Patch 2/2]: powerpc/hotplug/mm: Fix hot-add memory node assoc

From: Reza Arbab <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-26 14:32:11
Also in: lkml

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:46:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Reza Arbab [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:19:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
The commit message for 3af229f2071f says:

   In practice, we never see a system with 256 NUMA nodes, and in fact, we
   do not support node hotplug on power in the first place, so the nodes
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   that are online when we come up are the nodes that will be present for
   the lifetime of this kernel.

Is that no longer true?
I don't know what the reasoning behind that statement was at the time,
but as far as I can tell, the only thing missing for node hotplug now is
Balbir's patchset [1]. He fixes the resource issue which motivated
3af229f2071f and reverts it.

With that set, I can instantiate a new numa node just by doing
add_memory(nid, ...) where nid doesn't currently exist.
But does that actually happen on any real system?
I don't know if anything currently tries to do this. My interest in 
having this working is so that in the future, our coherent gpu memory 
could be added as a distinct node by the device driver.

-- 
Reza Arbab
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help