Re: [Patch 2/2]: powerpc/hotplug/mm: Fix hot-add memory node assoc
From: Reza Arbab <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-26 14:32:11
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:46:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Reza Arbab [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:19:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
The commit message for 3af229f2071f says: In practice, we never see a system with 256 NUMA nodes, and in fact, we do not support node hotplug on power in the first place, so the nodes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that are online when we come up are the nodes that will be present for the lifetime of this kernel. Is that no longer true?I don't know what the reasoning behind that statement was at the time, but as far as I can tell, the only thing missing for node hotplug now is Balbir's patchset [1]. He fixes the resource issue which motivated 3af229f2071f and reverts it. With that set, I can instantiate a new numa node just by doing add_memory(nid, ...) where nid doesn't currently exist.But does that actually happen on any real system?
I don't know if anything currently tries to do this. My interest in having this working is so that in the future, our coherent gpu memory could be added as a distinct node by the device driver. -- Reza Arbab