"Naveen N. Rao" [off-list ref] writes:

I also tested zram today with the command shared by Wilcox:

without patch:       1.493782568 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.08% )
with patch:          1.408457577 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.15% )

... which also shows an improvement along the same lines as x86, as 
reported by Minchan Kim.

I got:

  1.344847397 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.13% )

Using the C versions. Can you also benchmark those on your setup so we
can compare? So basically apply Matt's series but not your 2.

cheers