Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2017-03-22

Re: [v2 PATCH 4/4] powernv: Recover correct PACA on wakeup from a stop on P9 DD1

From: Gautham R Shenoy <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-22 11:08:12
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:59:46AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:24:18 +0530
"Gautham R. Shenoy" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <redacted>

POWER9 DD1.0 hardware has an issue due to which the SPRs of a thread
waking up from stop 0,1,2 with ESL=1 can endup being misplaced in the
core. Thus the HSPRG0 of a thread waking up from can contain the paca
pointer of its sibling.

This patch implements a context recovery framework within threads of a
core, by provisioning space in paca_struct for saving every sibling
threads's paca pointers. Basically, we should be able to arrive at the
right paca pointer from any of the thread's existing paca pointer.

At bootup, during powernv idle-init, we save the paca address of every
CPU in each one its siblings paca_struct in the slot corresponding to
this CPU's index in the core.

On wakeup from a stop, the thread will determine its index in the core
from the lower 2 bits of the PIR register and recover its PACA pointer
by indexing into the correct slot in the provisioned space in the
current PACA.

Furthermore, ensure that the NVGPRs are restored from the stack on the
way out by setting the NAPSTATELOST in paca.
Thanks for expanding on this, it makes the patch easier to follow :)

As noted before, I think if we use PACA_EXNMI for system reset, then
*hopefully* there should be minimal races with the initial use of other
thread's PACA at the start of the exception. So I'll work on getting
that in, but it need not prevent this patch from being merged first
IMO.
quoted
[Changelog written with inputs from svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com]

Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h       |  5 ++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c     |  1 +
 arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S     | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
index 708c3e5..4405630 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
@@ -172,6 +172,11 @@ struct paca_struct {
 	u8 thread_mask;
 	/* Mask to denote subcore sibling threads */
 	u8 subcore_sibling_mask;
+	/*
+	 * Pointer to an array which contains pointer
+	 * to the sibling threads' paca.
+	 */
+	struct paca_struct *thread_sibling_pacas[8];
Is 8 the right number? I wonder if we have a define for it.
Thats the maximum number of threads per core that we have had on POWER
so far.

Perhaps, I can make this

	 struct paca_struct **thread_sibling_pacas;

and allocate threads_per_core number of slots in
pnv_init_idle_states. Sounds ok ?

quoted
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 4367e7d..6ec5016 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -727,6 +727,7 @@ int main(void)
 	OFFSET(PACA_THREAD_IDLE_STATE, paca_struct, thread_idle_state);
 	OFFSET(PACA_THREAD_MASK, paca_struct, thread_mask);
 	OFFSET(PACA_SUBCORE_SIBLING_MASK, paca_struct, subcore_sibling_mask);
+	OFFSET(PACA_SIBLING_PACA_PTRS, paca_struct, thread_sibling_pacas);
 #endif
 
 	DEFINE(PPC_DBELL_SERVER, PPC_DBELL_SERVER);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
index 9957287..c2f2cfb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
@@ -375,6 +375,46 @@ _GLOBAL(power9_idle_stop)
 	li	r4,1
 	b	pnv_powersave_common
 	/* No return */
+
+
+/*
+ * On waking up from stop 0,1,2 with ESL=1 on POWER9 DD1,
+ * HSPRG0 will be set to the HSPRG0 value of one of the
+ * threads in this core. Thus the value we have in r13
+ * may not be this thread's paca pointer.
+ *
+ * Fortunately, the PIR remains invariant. Since this thread's
+ * paca pointer is recorded in all its sibling's paca, we can
+ * correctly recover this thread's paca pointer if we
+ * know the index of this thread in the core.
+ *
+ * This index can be obtained from the lower two bits of the PIR.
+ *
+ * i.e, thread's position in the core = PIR[62:63].
+ * If this value is i, then this thread's paca is
+ * paca->thread_sibling_pacas[i].
+ */
+power9_dd1_recover_paca:
+	mfspr	r4, SPRN_PIR
+	clrldi	r4, r4, 62
Does SPRN_TIR work?
I wasn't aware of SPRN_TIR!

I can check this. If my reading of the ISA is correct, TIR should
contain the thread number which are in the range [0..3].
quoted
+	/*
+	 * Since each entry in thread_sibling_pacas is 8 bytes
+	 * we need to left-shift by 3 bits. Thus r4 = i * 8
+	 */
+	sldi	r4, r4, 3
+	/* Get &paca->thread_sibling_pacas[0] in r5 */
+	addi	r5, r13, PACA_SIBLING_PACA_PTRS
+	/* Load paca->thread_sibling_pacas[i] into r13 */
+	ldx	r13, r4, r5
+	SET_PACA(r13)
+	/*
+	 * Indicate that we have lost NVGPR state
+	 * which needs to be restored from the stack.
+	 */
+	li	r3, 1
+	stb	r0,PACA_NAPSTATELOST(r13)
+	blr
+
 /*
  * Called from reset vector. Check whether we have woken up with
  * hypervisor state loss. If yes, restore hypervisor state and return
@@ -385,7 +425,14 @@ _GLOBAL(power9_idle_stop)
  */
 _GLOBAL(pnv_restore_hyp_resource)
 BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
-	ld	r2,PACATOC(r13);
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(70)
+	mflr 	r6
+	bl	power9_dd1_recover_paca
+	mtlr	r6
+	ld	r2, PACATOC(r13)
+FTR_SECTION_ELSE_NESTED(70)
+	ld	r2, PACATOC(r13)
+ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_NESTED_IFSET(CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD1, 70)
This is quite neat now you've moved it to its own function. Nice.
It will be only a trivial clash with my patches now, I think.
Sure!
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Thanks for reviewing the patch.

--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help