OPAL returns OPAL_WRONG_STATE for XSCOM operations
done to read any core FIR which is sleeping, offline.
On Friday 27 January 2017 05:47 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Vipin K Parashar [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Added check for OPAL_WRONG_STATE error code returned from OPAL.
Currently Linux flashes "unexpected error" over console for this
error. This will avoid throwing such message and return I/O error
for such OPAL failures.
Why do we expect to get OPAL_WRONG_STATE ?
cheers