On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 07:15 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:15:35PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
+ * For all these fields, a value of 0 means that the information
+ * is not known.
+ if (sets == 0)
+ info->assoc = 0xffff;
+ else
...
Is this correct? A fully associative cache should be encoded as sets == 1,
if there are buggy firmwares that set it to 0 instead it should do the same
as 1 here I think?
No, I just made a stupid mistake I think. PAPR does say sets=1 is fully
associative which makes sense. Probably a typo.
Or is 0xffff indicating "unknown" here... But in that
case the comment above says assoc should be 0 instead.
No it's me.
Cheers,
Ben.