Re: [PATCH] powerpc/boot: request no dynamic linker for boot wrapper
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2016-11-29 03:42:35
Nicholas Piggin [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:07:39 +1100 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Nicholas Piggin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper b/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper index 404b3aa..cd941a8 100755 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper@@ -181,6 +181,13 @@ case "$elfformat" in elf32-powerpc) format=elf32ppc ;; esac +# Do not include PT_INTERP segment when linking pie. Non-pie linking +# just ignores this option. +LD_VERSION=$(${CROSS}ld --version | $srctree/scripts/ld-version.sh) +LD_NO_DL_MIN_VERSION=$(echo 2.26 | $srctree/scripts/ld-version.sh) +if [ "$LD_VERSION" -ge "$LD_NO_DL_MIN_VERSION" ] ; then + nodl="--no-dynamic-linker" +fiSome distros (RHEL at least?), ship the wrapper as a standalone script. So I don't think we can call things in $srctree. Or at least I don't know how that's supposed to work when it's shipped standalone. We're also basically reinventing ld-option, which is a PITA.Okay I didn't realize that. It's already using mkuboot.sh, but only for uboot targets... I don't know, I don't have any good ideas at the moment.
That looks like a bug, but I guess no one runs Fedora/RHEL on those
machines? Previously it just called mkimage using $PATH.
The Fedora spec file does:
make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT bootwrapper_install WRAPPER_OBJDIR=%{_libdir}/kernel-wrapper WRAPPER_DTSDIR=%{_libdir}/kernel-wrapper/dts
bootwrapper_install installs a bunch of files, and also calls:
quiet_cmd_install_wrapper = INSTALL $(patsubst $(DESTDIR)$(WRAPPER_BINDIR)/%,%,$@)
cmd_install_wrapper = $(INSTALL) -m0755 $(patsubst $(DESTDIR)$(WRAPPER_BINDIR)/%,$(srctree)/$(obj)/%,$@) $@ ;\
sed -i $@ -e 's%^object=.*%object=$(WRAPPER_OBJDIR)%' \
-e 's%^objbin=.*%objbin=$(WRAPPER_BINDIR)%' \
ie. it seds the script. So we could probably just install ld-version.sh
into $(DESTDIR)$(WRAPPER_OBJDIR) and then sed $srctree maybe?
But it's old code and I'm not that across how it gets used in the wild.
CC'ing Gustavo who is our Fedora/RHEL/Power guy.
cheers