Re: [PATCH v6] powerpc: Do not make the entire heap executable
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-24 23:17:38
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jason Gunthorpe [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:54:12AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Denys Vlasenko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 32-bit powerpc the ELF PLT sections of binaries (built with --bss-plt, or with a toolchain which defaults to it) look like this:...quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <redacted> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <redacted> Acked-by: Kees Cook <redacted> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> CC: Paul Mackerras <redacted> CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <redacted> CC: Kees Cook <redacted> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> CC: Florian Weimer <redacted> CC: linux-mm@kvack.org CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Changes since v5: * made do_brk_flags() error out if any bits other than VM_EXEC are set. (Kees Cook: "With this, I'd be happy to Ack.") See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/661595/Excellent, thanks for the v6! Should this go via the ppc tree or the -mm tree?-mm would be best, given the diffstat I think it's less likely to conflict if it goes via -mm.Okay, excellent. Andrew, do you have this already in email? I think you weren't on the explicit CC from the v6...FWIW (and ping), Tested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <redacted> On ARM32 (kirkwood) and PPC32 (405) For reference, here is the patchwork URL: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/677753/
Hi Andrew, Can you pick this up? Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security