Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 8 authors, 2016-10-24

Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check

From: rkrcmar@redhat.com <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-24 15:05:48
Also in: kvm, linux-s390, lkml

2016-10-24 16:42+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
On 21/10/2016 20:39, rkrcmar@redhat.com wrote:
quoted
2016-10-21 11:27+0000, David Laight:
quoted
From: Pan Xinhui
quoted
Sent: 20 October 2016 22:28
Commit ("x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check") add one field "__u8
preempted" into struct kvm_steal_time. This field tells if one vcpu is
running or not.

It is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed. 2) the vcpu is
preempted. Other values means the vcpu has been preempted.

Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <redacted>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
index 2a71c8f..3376f13 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
@@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME: 0x4b564d03
 		__u64 steal;
 		__u32 version;
 		__u32 flags;
-		__u32 pad[12];
+		__u8  preempted;
+		__u32 pad[11];
 	}
I think I'd be explicit about the 3 pad bytes you've left.
Seconded.

With that change are all KVM bits

Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <redacted>
Saw this after replying to the previous message.  If you need to post v6
of the full series, it would be nice if you removed the
kvm_read_guest_cached.  But anyway it wasn't my intention to override Radim.
The patch was acceptable to me even now, so I definitely wouldn't mind
if it were even nicer. :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help