Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-21

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-20 02:28:57
Also in: lkml

christophe leroy [off-list ref] writes:
Le 19/09/2016 =C3=A0 07:50, Aneesh Kumar K.V a =C3=A9crit :
quoted
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+#else
+static void hugepd_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *hugepte)
+{
+	BUG();
+}
+
 #endif

I was expecting that BUG will get removed in the next patch. But I don't
see it in the next patch. Considering
@@ -475,11 +453,10 @@ static void free_hugepd_range(struct mmu_gather *t=
lb, hugepd_t *hpdp, int pdshif
quoted
        for (i =3D 0; i < num_hugepd; i++, hpdp++)
                hpdp->pd =3D 0;

-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
-	hugepd_free(tlb, hugepte);
-#else
-	pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, hugepte, pdshift - shift);
-#endif
+	if (shift >=3D pdshift)
+		hugepd_free(tlb, hugepte);
+	else
+		pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, hugepte, pdshift - shift);
 }

What is that I am missing ?
Previously, call to hugepd_free() was compiled only when #ifdef=20
CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
Now, it is compiled at all time, but it should never be called if not=20
CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E because we always have shift < pdshift in that case.
Then the function needs to be defined anyway but should never be called.=
=20
Should I just define it static inline {} ?
For 8M with 4K mode, we have shift >=3D pdshift right ?

-aneesh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help